Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mick Cowan's avatar

What was learnt:

1. Kudos to the coaches. Following the ho-ha from last week and more significantly, the critique of the first quarter in the Melbourne game, Sam and his coaching crew deserve plaudits for the way in which they set up and managed the game plan and game strategy.

a) The game strategy was adapted to both circumstances and situations. With the early onslaught, it was recognised that the back six needed some additional help, so Hardwick went back as an extra defender to assist with the defensive set up. This meant that we had forward 4 as we still started the high half forward, leaving a plus 1 in our defensive 50. What was interesting is that both teams were happy to have a plus 1, however when Hardwick went forward so too did his direct opponent. This had two ramifications – i) their forward 50 was crowded for leading lanes for Naughton & JUH which has often been how they set up their scoring shots. This meant that they bombed to the hot spot which, aside from two notable exceptions, we were able to kill or intercept; and ii) our forward 50 was quite open which gave our forwards space to work in and really assisted Gunston and Dear as the back 5 of the Dogs could be easily separated and not allow for the interceptor (usually Jones) come across to spoil or take the mark.

Then when Sicily went down, Hardwick became the temporary replacement until Larazus-like, Sicily re-appeared. Interestingly, late in the 2nd quarter, Hardwick started as a defensive wingman that pushed Morrison into the high half forward role as we looked to shore up the red time pressure which is still a work in progress. It may be a statistical first that he has played as a forward, mid & defender.

b) Selection of and implementation of the sub. Undoubtedly, the selection of the sub has been one of the mysteries of life for supporters this year but may well reflect the impact of injuries on selection. In selecting Watson who would have been on manage minutes, he became the impact sub, although if Lazarus hadn’t had risen, it may have been a different story. Similarly, bringing him in the 3rd quarter was a recognition that there was going into space in our forward 50 to work with and the speed of Watson was to be more significant than the endurance and strength of Mackenzie who hadn’t had a poor game.

c) Sicily going forward in the final quarter appears to be a consensus decision, however no one builds a statue to a committee, so Sam should be recognised for making the final decision. As is said of good coaches: “coaches take the blame and players take the praise”. Late in the quarter, it was also Will Day who came back to play the extra defender when the stakes were at their highest, yet our mids were still competitive around the ball.

2. Learning is happening amongst the playing group. For those of us who made the trip out to Whitten Oval for the pre-season game against the Dogs, the first three minutes would’ve created some serious cases of PTSD as to how this game was to play out. However, aided by the strategic decisions from the coach’s box, a number of senior players took the bit between their teeth and weren’t going to accept what was happening. This coincided with the rotation of Nash into the centre square which Sam alluded to in press conference. If you have the chance to watch his first 5 minutes on the ground, it is worth noting the impact he had on the game to turn the tide. It was curious that our starting centre square was Newcombe, Worpel & Day given Nash’s record against Bontempelli and Liberatore.

3. “Meek and potatoes" with gravy this week. Whilst the first few minutes didn’t augur for Meek and brought back memories of the pre-season game, he showed a further dimension to his game this week in a couple of ways. Firstly, by getting his knees dirty and getting into the ground ball pack with his huge frame, he allowed Day, Newcombe, Nash & Worpel to become the outlets for any ground ball wins whereas in previous weeks he had looked to be the receiver of their dirty work. Secondly, whilst he wasn’t always able to keep up with English, he put himself into dangerous situations with the clever tap to Ward for the crumbing goal as well as his own goal from the interference in the marking contest. Structurally, the first skill set – getting to the bottom of packs - is really important to us as it allows us options on the outside and secondly, it also keeps Nash fresh for when he has to act as the chop out ruck around the ground. Meek also learnt his lesson from last week in a defensive pack situation to kill the ball rather than trying to mark it.

4. Midfield cohesion and clean hands in the centre square. For our mids, given that they are not fleet of foot, the need to be clean and connected around the contest is really important if we are to start our attack from forward of centre. With Day returning, the rotation of our midfield looks to be more balanced and better able to run out games. For brief periods, Worpel & Newcombe went forward and Day back with Nash playing the around ground ruck after Dear had contested the centre bounces. The first clearance of the last quarter demonstrated the type of clearance we are looking to enact with quick hands around the centre circle with Nash handballing to Impey off half back for a strong forward entry and goal. It had shades of the way the Tigers used Rioli off half back from time to time. There was another example earlier in the game as well. The unfortunate aspect of when clean hands don’t work for us was when the Dogs came out of the contest to kick two quick goals to shift the momentum – Newcombe both times was the unlucky one in not body lining the ball and then half fumble. I realise some will say that this is harsh, but when you play Bont and Libba, this is all they need.

5. The “whipping boys” played their roles. Every club has them and supporters “love” to flog them, however in a game like this, they need to be given their dues. The issue for them is that too often the subtlety of their roles are not “respected”. In taking on Williams, Maginness was able to cut down an exit avenue for the Dogs which lead to some back half turnovers. Similarly, Morrison on the other wing was able to ensure that they didn’t have a clear alternative route to their forward 50. Think of the times that they had to kick across wing to wing to switch their attack. Yes they both do both make skill/decision errors, however their application to their role has to be recognised. Another player who I think is unduly “whipped” and he was made mention of in Sam’s presser is Impey who cannot be faulted in any game for his effort and sometimes, I think bites off more than he can chew which draws the ire of the supporters. Nash provided the two opportunities for Dear in the last quarter. For this group, when the “better” players are more consistent and add their dash of brilliance eg. CMac & Weddle, their contributions are more effective.

6. The question of leadership has to be put to bed. Again, it has been interesting to hear some concerns about the leadership qualities of Sicily since the season started. As most of us only see two hours of their week, it is an area that is fraught with danger when one looks to pass judgement. Given that actions always speak louder than words, thus when he puts his arm to come back on; then realise that he may be a risk to the team, but provides a strategic alternative; we have to pause and recognize that perhaps we are too quick to judge. Similarly, his bake of Watson for his miss, whilst not perfect, was driven by the right intention and is another leadership learning for him. (However, Sis’s memory may be like most supporters for a player to miss two shots from as close as that in his first four games is some feat! Cats’ game was the other one.)

7. Clean entries inside 50 allow for better scoring opportunities & reward for effort. This is the first time for the year that I can recall the majority of our scoring shots were between the 45 degree arc from the goal square/centre corridor rather being closer to the boundary line, aside from Gunston who was caught wide a few times. Notwithstanding, the outrageous goals from CMac and Weddle, the other goals where much more makeable this week. When you look at our scoring efficiency I50 this week was 67% whereas from Rd.1 to 7 it read 49% (Dons); 43% (Dees); 40% (Cats); 34% (Pies); 37% (Suns); 50% (Roos); 42% (Swans); there is a significant difference. I’m sure this % will prove to be an outlier, however, if we can get to the high 40% more regularly, then the chances of posting a defendable score will be significantly increased.

8. Predictability is a key to performance. When you look at the way the game panned out, being predictable to each other made a significant difference to the pattern of play. Nothing typified this more than Weddle’s searching runs which were in straight lines towards to the goals rather than including a half circle or stop/start component to them. This would have assisted those inside 50 to work out their own leading patterns. Similarly, as mentioned earlier, with the big bloke fighting on the ground, the mids were able to set up a defensive/offensive structure around these packs. The back six has had this component all year with the way Scrimshaw, Frost and Sicily have worked to spoil or intercept forward entries, whereas the other two parts of the team hadn’t quite gelled yet.

Expand full comment
Stuart McKenzie's avatar

Seriously Mick, you should be working for Champion Data. Great analysis and very enjoyable reading, as always. A couple of notable points for me were:

1. We stopped the intercept marks in our forward 50. This has been a killer all season with so many of our entries quickly neutralized by an opposition mark.

2. This in turn helped to reduce the quick rebound from our forward 50, which has been an issue all season, no more so than the previous week against Sydney. In this respect we were aided to an extent by several blooper moments from the Dogs when attempting to exit our forward 50, but overall we did an excellent job in countering their rebound.

3. As you say, Sam had very few 'hair losing' moments with our diabolical error rate as low as it's been all season and probably for some time. Last week, we had two 2 goal turnarounds and countless occasions where we butchered the ball, the impact of which was to deny us a scoring opportunity and/or to create a scoring opportunity for the opposition.

4. A couple of issues that need work:

* While Connor Mac had a productive game with his three goals, it would be good to find a way to get him into the game more. He has a lot to offer but can have blocks of games where he's just not involved at all.

* What to do with Josh Ward who is struggling to have the impact we'd hoped to see in this, his third season? He's perhaps a victim of playing outside of his ideal role, which is as an inside midfielder, but with the return of Will Day, it's hard to see how that's going to change. He's a good and creative user of the footy and he's another one that we need to find a way to get more involved.

*Centre bounce goals again hurt us, and this has been a recurring theme across the season and had we lost, would have been the biggest contributing factor. It's disappointing and surprising given that we were so strong in this area last season.

*Aside from centre bounces, the other factor that could have cost us that victory was our goal kicking. Sam made reference to it after the game, specifically that we can't do any more work on it than we currently are, but it is an ongoing concern.

*Take your point about the role playing of Morrison and Maginness, and it's hard to see how there's a role for either Finn or Harry as this group develops. The continued selection of Finn in a non-tagging role is odd and perhaps he's just a place holder until Chad is available. But this isn't a week to be negative.

5. Selection will be interesting this week. Mabior returns, but it's very hard to work out who goes out, suspect it will be Harry or Josh Ward and it's likely that Watson will be in the 22, which likely leaves Harry or Ward as the sub.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts