Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stuart McKenzie's avatar

Thanks Danny, really nice summary. It's been a great year of development for the players you mention and if that group can have a solid pre-season and remain injury free, there should be further growth in 2024, especially in Weddle, Mackenzie and Mitchell. What's equally exciting is that there are several other young / inexperienced players that we can legitimately hope for some real improvement in 2024

- Sam Butler, who was selected ahead of Connor McDonald in the 2021 draft, has shown promise,

- Ned Reeves is only one season into recovery from a shoulder reco and should only improve with a full pre-season and more games,

- CJ has played only 45 games and is a clear talent, but needs to stay injury free,

- Max Ramsden is an exciting, albeit raw prospect who could be that true forward/ruck hybrid that's so hard to find and needs a big finish with Box Hill followed by a pre-season ,

- Brocky, (who knows if he's staying or not, though there's plenty of chatter in WA that he's coming home) but he's young and has shown in multiple games that he can be a quality small forward,

- Bailey McDonald has had a small taste and he too needs a strong finish with Box Hill and a good pre-season,

- Ned Long looks like a ready-made AFL player who could slot into our midfield but understandably lacks opportunity,

- Ryan, Denver and Blancky are showing some promising signs in the back end of this season who also need a good finish followed by a strong pre-season.

So, outside of the crop that are now thriving at AFL level that you've highlighted, there's a solid group behind them and it would be fantastic if one or more of them took the big leap in season 2024. Not to mention that we're yet to see Serong (this season), Stephens and Hustwaite who have performed consistently well for Box Hill. For a team 16th on the ladder, our depth is impressive.

What's equally exciting, is that despite our promising finish to the season we're anchored to 16th on the ladder and will thus have a pick in the top 5, depending on academy selections and any concessions granted to North. And we finally have a quality father-son, with multiple phantom drafts having Will McCabe inside the top 20. This means that as we did last year, we will again bring in two first round selections, one which will be inside the top 6. If we nail those picks and get continued development from the sizeable group of players aged 24 and under, our list will be in an excellent position which will give us leverage to trade players who are not getting opportunity and to pursue free agents on a pure needs basis. There's a lot to look forward to.

Expand full comment
Mick Cowan's avatar

Agree with the above.

The media analysis of our list management has been "damned if you do; damned if you don't" argument. The debate about the recruitment of Mitchell, O'Meara and Wingard had been criticised as "selling the farm" (i.e. draft picks) for no reward and had been probably more vociferous than assessment of the list cull last year. The other aspect to this issue being if you stand still, you will fall behind; there was no realistic alternative.

(As Daniel Hoyne from Champion Data is quick to recite - "Without data, you're just a flog with an opinion" - this may be something to keep in mind.)

Reflecting on how the season has played out for the group listed above, particularly the midfield, the return to form of Worpel; the progression of Newcombe and Day; and the development of Nash (from Round 1 sub to an automatic selection) has probably assisted with the introduction of Mackenzie and continued induction of Ward and Macdonald. (The other factor here has been the injury free season that these four have had, taking into account the manner in which they approach the contest has been exceptional.)

I suspect that the "long term" strategy at the start of the season would have seen Ward, Mackenzie and Macdonald in more centre square contests, given their "lighter" bodies may not have seen our clearance dominance as great as it has been over the season. Allowing these 1st & 2nd year players to operate on the outer ring of the contest will set them up for 2024, taking into account another (or first) full preseason. There are elements here of the "traditional" Hawthorn apprenticeship model where players had a solid grounding in the twos, which Sam went through himself.

As we all realise, progress is not a linear, so it will be interesting to see how 2024 is approached in terms of trades/drafts and probably more significantly, injury. Looking back to the start of the year, if Mitch Lewis had been available for the first part of the year, the debate on the list may have saved a lot of trees/downloads.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts