Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mick Cowan's avatar

What was learnt i.e. for this week, what was known:

1. Speed kills – Leg speed from the contest will kill teams that don’t have breakaway players who either make space when their team has possession or have the capacity to chase down/pressure the opposition. Our midfield just doesn’t have this capacity. If you watched the first twenty minutes of the Box Hill game, you would have seen the issue that was to come. The potential replacements aren’t, in the short-term, going to address this situation. This is where the availability of CJ and Day for his agility are coming home to roost.

2. Clean hands are a given for quality ball control – A corollary of the previous point is the need for clean hands to allow for a chain of possessions, particularly from the contest. This game highlighted the need for this skill to become innate rather than an inconsistent skill set.

3. Our forward & back halves are “small” – With only Chol & Ramsden playing as key talls, this meant that taking on Collins, Ballard, Andrew & Lukosius, given Maginness “tagged” Flanders, this meant Hardwick, Moore, Ginnivan & CMac were playing “tall”. Added to this, the structure of pushing either CMac or Moore to the midfield meant that any forward entry had to be precise. Given the mids couldn’t provide the necessary clean inside 50 entries to a hit up lead, the Suns were able to manipulate the match ups to suit themselves. As to the backs, again with King, Walter (195cm) & Read all being taller than any of “tall” defenders (and as agile), the backs were up against it. Taking this into account, they once again applied themselves to the task.

4. Our midfield don’t understand Einstein’s theory of insanity – the number of times that both Worpel and Newcombe thought that they could beat the second tackle after beating the first was mind boggling. Having beaten the first tackler on some occasions, they just needed to get the ball forward. If the Pies game showed anything, a chaos entry was more likely to be effective than seeking the perfect pass. Think of how Hardwick was able to react quicker to some of these rushed entries.

Observations:

• Undoubtedly a disappointing outcome, however it wasn’t as dismal as the match against the Swans in the early part of last year. Whilst there is a higher expectation this year, the body of evidence isn’t there to justify the claim to be better than last year at this stage.

• Interesting that pre-game supporters were arguing that Nash had to take Rowell, given the way he plays wouldn’t work for Maginness, the stats and the eye indicate that Nash did impact on the performance of Rowell. The fact that Anderson and Miller were able to get off the chain demonstrated that our midfield working as a group have much to do from a defensive perspective.

• With the small forward structure, the lack of forward pressure was disappointing as evidenced by the capacity of the Suns’ defenders to switch play in their defensive 50.

• Playing Ramsden in the ruck for the better part of the last quarter showed Sam was prepared to try to gain something from the game i.e. see what Ramsden has to offer. His work in the air around the ground is much superior to either Meek or Reeves. As to whether Meek was injured or rested in the last quarter, not playing him forward at that stage of the game meant Sicily going forward which I doubt was a learning experience for anyone. Sam also had Moore in the centre square looking to inject some spread from contest I’d suggest. The problem here is that the days of a 177cm midfielder having an impact in the centre square are an exception eg. Neale, Serong. It was “interesting” that CMac didn’t have one centre square attendance.

• Credit to Finn for his ability to make a contest and to hit the scoreboard after a shaky start. Flanders certainly had plenty of possessions, however aside from the first centre square clearance, they were in general play in the back half and rarely forward of centre.

Starting 4:

1st Qrt: Nash (22); Worpel (14); Ward (6)

2nd Qrt: Nash; Worpel; Newcombe (16)

3rd Qrt: Worpel; Newcombe; Hustwaite (13)

4th Qrt: Nash; Newcombe; Moore (9)

(Meek 22/Ramsden 6/ Mackenzie 6)

The issue of the week – who’s coming in?

With the tsunami of disappointment, there is the “call” to make changes, but we actually need to look at who is available to come in and then whether they would be addressing the problem(s) – both real or perceived. These are the listed players who played with BH on Saturday:

Morrison – midfielder/small defender (brings more experience.)

Reeves – ruck (not an appreciable difference to Meek.)

Gunston – tall forward (brings experience, but at the expense of Ramsden?)

Stephens – inside midfielder (similar skill set to the current inside mids.)

Ryan – marking medium defender (debut)

Serong – tall defender (taller and more a marking interceptor than a running one.)

Dear – tall forward (debut)

Bennetts – small forward 178cm (debut)

B. Macdonald – medium defender (may provide more aggressive running from behind.)

O’Sullivan – small forward 177cm (debut)

Tucker – ruckman (debut)

Expand full comment
Stuart McKenzie's avatar

Mick makes a number of great points (as usual). The lack of leg speed and run from behind is stark and has been noticeable all season. It has highlighted the importance of CJ and Will Day, who while not necessarily explosive, has great evasion skills and is very quick to react.

A few thoughts:

1. As noted, the lack of speed and run from behind continues to be an issue. Aside from Weddle, our lack of support run has been a real standout this season. I'm not sure whether, after an interrupted pre-season, Bailey McDonald is ready for senior footy, but we have to look at him reasonably soon and we really have to get Impey and Seamus running.

2. There's a noticeable lack of intensity this season and I guess there's plenty of theories as to why that might be - young players just happy to be getting a game, getting ahead of ourselves after a solid back half of 2023 for example - but it is unacceptable to play with such little pressure on the opposition. In terms of seeing a real shift in our intensity, I am hopeful that this was the game we had to have.

3. On a similar note, there's so many players that are well below their capability - why that is, who knows. Is there any merit in one or two positional changes to try and trigger some spark - could Cam Mackenzie be given a few games playing at half back - his composure and kicking could be an asset and he wouldn't be the first young midfielder to benefit from a spell playing behind the ball. While Amon is getting the ball, and yes he had big metres gained last week, he isn't providing run from behind, his disposal numbers are flattered by the kick ins he takes and we aren't generating ball movement from his possessions. Is it worth playing him back on the wing? Connor Mac started the season pretty well, but is clearly struggling. We hear talk of his potential to play as a forward-midfielder hybrid, but rarely see him give midfield minutes. Is it worth changing that mix to something to a 50-50 split?

4. Yes, Finn kicked 3 goals and had a real dip, but what is his role in our team, as it changes each week. One week he's the sub, one week he's on Daicos but not in a hard tag role and one week he's playing as a defensive forward. This is disruptive for both him and the team. If he plays, it has to be in an on-ball role stopping the opposition's best midfielder. More to the point though, is he really the guy we want to invest in right now, because doing so only detracts from the development of Ward, Mackenzie and Hustwaite.

5. In a funny way, the loss of Denver has hurt as playing him as a third tall up forward, with the flexibility of swinging to defence if necessary, could have been handy, especially while Lewis has been out.

6. While it was terribly disappointing, I don't think we'll be the only team that is on the receiving end of a whacking up there at that time of day. It's just about the toughest away fixture in the competition.

I remain of the view that we've been pretty good this season and at the risk of raising a controversial subject - expected score - going into this game we were 1-3 with a % of 90 (based on expected score). Unfortunately, there has been a number of 15-20 minute periods within games that has been very costly. On Saturday night, regrettably, it was an entire game where we were dominated. I am prepared to consign this loss to being "one of those days" (which as Campbell Brown noted does happen to young teams) but that will only be the case if we see some greater consistency of effort and genuine signs of development.

Last year, we saw Jai and Will Day really take their games to a new level and in the second half of the season, we saw the team start to gel and play competitively against most opposition. We are only 5 rounds into the season and there's 18 to go. Let's hope that later in the season, we're lauding the development of a number of individuals and some real improvement as a team.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts