Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kane's avatar

Butler has been a great addition to the midfield. He has shown an unflinching demeanour and is a clever footballer. Butler's tackling is a weapon and is also contagious amongst the team. What an amazing story after the cruel blow he was dealt last year.

Expand full comment
Mick Cowan's avatar

What was learnt:

1. The coach was courageous – Whilst he has been labelled a “genius” by some, there is little doubt that Mitchell is courageous in his tactical decisions. To sub out Hustwaite, as a midfielder, from an already weakened line within the team at half-time with Jiath, another running defender, took courage to recognize that what was on offer wasn’t working. The immediate implications of this was to: a) move Amon into a high half forward role – not one he has played recently nor trained for but also assisted in countering the dominance of the Crows wings; and b) bring Watson and Moore into the centre square rotations in the second half which gave us some speed away from these contests.

2. A centre square ambush gave us momentum after half-time – Following on from this, starting Watson in the centre square to start the quarter may well have caught the Crows off guard. Whilst he has had some fleeting visits to the centre clearances, Watson hasn’t started a quarter in there. If you believe that you start your best clearance players to begin a quarter, Watson may not have been on the Crows’ “what if” questions for this scenario. Watson’s impact was immediate in the first contest, he flashed across the ball drop attracting the attention of two Crows, which gave Nash time and space for a clean clearance which had been lacking in the first half. This led to the entry for the McDonald goal. Watson then followed up at the next contest with a deft tap to Newcombe which gave us territory on night it was important. As to playing more as a midfielder, the contest in the Crows’ forward line where Rankine goaled, demonstrated how his size may not work for him in more congested contests.

3. Making assessments at ¼ time are always fraught with danger – At ¼ time, it looked as though Gunston’s age was catching up with him as he looked to battle with the tall Crows’ defenders who are al quite mobile. However, as he has shown since coming back into the team, his football IQ allowed him to reset and have a major impact on the game, particularly ensuring that we didn’t go into half-time facing an insurmountable lead. This was not helped by our other forwards looking slow as the Crows exited their defensive 50.

4. This was a game that Barrass was recruited for – When you look at the goal kicking table, the Crows have two tall forwards equal to our leading goal kicker, so the role played by Barrass to quell Thilthorpe was particularly significant. Thilthorpe’s one good look was generated by a breakdown in our centre square work rather than Barrass’s efforts. Similarly, Barrass’s chase on Thilthorpe just before half-time demonstrated his commitment to the cause.

5. Impey learnt from an earlier contest for the key moment – Having been caught out in the 2nd quarter, where he lost his feet in a contest when the Crows had a clean break and they goaled. Then in the last quarter, when we had regained the lead, he found himself in a similar contest and was able to kill that contest. With Amon going forward in the second half, Impey’s run off half back proved to be vital in the win.

Observations:

• Watson’s impact on the game aside from his centre clearance work was important. Ward was another to go under the radar for his defensive grunt work.

• Newcombe’s ability to work through the tag as the game progressed – finished top 10 disposals for us - was a sign of progression.

• Whilst Ramsden’s kicking for goal isn’t a toss of the coin, but a roll of the dice, his work in contesting marking contests was another important contribution to the game. He has an athletic profile in an awkward body which can make him difficult to defend.

• Hustwaite being subbed off at half-time for the second time this season looks like it will be hard for him for the remainder of the season as others take their chances.

• Mitchell’s disposal can still be an issue – in the 2nd quarter, we had he set up the kick out to the open side and he missed the outlet kick; then later he worked hard to create the overlap run, but his handball went behind Ginnivan which stopped the flow.

• The “small” wingers were under pressure early, but as stated above the changes at half-time provided assistance to both for the later part of the game. Morrison had a vital 1 on 2 win on an exit from our defensive half late in the game.

• Meek worked his way into the game after O’Brien dominated the early going – matching him for marks and the hit out count went: 3/9; 11/10; 12/7; 14/17 matched by clearances going: 6/11; 8/10; 11/9; 14/14.

• 0 disposals quarters – Mitchell (1st & 4th), Macdonald (2nd), Hardwick (3rd)

• Tackle count by quarter – 9/19; 22/10; 23/18; 24/28

• I50 count by quarter – 9/18; 10/19; 19/12; 14/10. When you look at the halves: 19/37 vs. 33/22 – it was the game of two halves.

• TOG % - Bottom 5 (leaving out subs): Mitchell 65% Butler 66%, D’Ambrosio 70% C. Macdonald 72%, Nash 75%, Newcombe 76%. (Battle 97% & Weddle 92% highest.)

• Kicking efficiency (DE): Barrass 100% (88), Battle 80% (60), Moore 75% (78), Impey 74% (79), Ginnivan 71% (75).

D’Ambrosio 33% (53), Mitchell 33% (50), Butler 30% (45), Chol 22% (25) Ramsden 40% (17), Hustwaite 0% (25)

Starting 4: (CBA/CC)

1st Qrt: Newcombe (13/0) Nash (13/2) Ward (4/0)

2nd Qrt: Newcombe Worpel Butler (5/0)

3rd Qrt: Newcombe Nash Watson (3/1 – all 2nd half)

4th Qrt: Newcombe Nash Moore (5/0 – all 2nd half)

Meek 15/0 Hustwaite 2/0

(Impey 0/1 Weddle 0/1 – the overlap run from half back as an outlet is handy.)

With the low goal count, CBAs were a season low and reflected in how few players went through the centre square. The fact that Watson and Moore had more CBAs than Hustwaite is a indicator of concern for him. Butler’s work rate around the ground with his tackle pressure associated with his leg speed puts him on safer ground at the minute even with some managed workload issues.

Issue for the week:

With Jiath providing the energy, pace and enthusiasm associated as the norms for a sub, it does create a team balance issue playing another defensive option. The last two weeks with a midfielder being subbed out, it has meant that the back half had to be re-arranged with Impey last week and Amon this week being the one shifted to accommodate Jiath. Considering that Sicily will return at some stage after the bye, will Jiath be the best option as sub, purely on how he is best used on the ground as against the structure of the team?

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts