Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mick Cowan's avatar

What was learnt:

1. It may not have been Meek’s day; it was his moment and he took it – This cliché is usually rolled out when a player comes to have an impact on a game in the last quarter after being quiet earlier in the game. For Meek, the first quarter was important given he was coming up against an opponent who has beaten him in the last couple of games, allowing Port to get off to a quick start which had us chasing tail for the rest of these games. Given Port had the wind, and their first goal indicated how easily goals could’ve been scored in the conditions, exacerbated by Sicily’s brain fade, it was vital for Meek to ensure that even an undermanned Port midfield didn’t get a sniff nor allow self-doubt come into our mid’s minds. Meek’s three centre square clearances, whilst agricultural in nature, suited the circumstances as territory was as significant as hitting a target inside 50. If Port was able to get a 5-goal lead in the first quarter, then the strategy of the entire day could’ve been very different. (See next).

2. Kudos to the coaching panel – i) Following on from the previous point, the fact that we were able more than hold our own in the first quarter meant that the coaches held their nerve and didn’t look to drop one behind the ball given the wind conditions. This meant that we were able to keep our shape inside F50. When you look at how Port set up in the 2nd quarter, playing one behind the ball worked to our advantage being able to have 1-2 free defenders to set up the defensive wall as well as allow for the switch to the open side easier to construct. This also provided Sicily with the chance to get some touch back. ii) Since Mitchell took over, we’ve lauded the work of the Big 4 (Day, Newcombe, Nash & Worpel), however in the past 2 years we’ve seen the integration of Ward & Mackenzie into the rotation along with the cameos provided by Moore and Watson. Port have had a similar set up with JHF, Butters, Rozee and Drew with recent support for Bergman plus Wines although his CBAs have diminished in recent times. In this game, with Maginness tagging Butters and Drew taking Newcombe, the fact Port didn’t have a competitive B team to go with our depth.

3. Development of Ward is raising his ceiling as well as his floor – Given match winners are labelled to win or impact a game off their own boot in a quarter or half; very good players are those who difference between their best and worst games is marginal at best. For a young player, the measurement is to ensure that as they find their feet and work at developing their best, they need to ensure that the level of their worst rises at the same time. There is little benefit for their best to rise, and their worst remains at a low level, and this is where Ward’s game has progressed to this season. He may not become a Sam Mitchell midfielder, but there is nothing to stop him becoming a Jordan Lewis or Jack Crisp type midfielder – tough, reliable, not great at something, but very good at everything. A couple of key differences in his game to say Mackenzie, who supporters see as comparable, is his preparedness to use his non-dominant foot and take the first option. Again, it’s a skill that is solid, not exceptional, but in conditions such as yesterday was vital. BTW Morrison is another example of this progression over his past 20-30 games where his better has improved and his worst has risen with this progression.

4. Lewis changes the dynamic of the F50 – Having only played five games since the start of last season with two of these games’ injury impacted, it has been easy to “forget” how Lewis changes the dynamics of the F50. With Chol and Dear, they both like to operate deep inside the 50m arc with Gunston often the one to lead up to the arc, this allows opponents to roll back and provide a cluttered F50 to work with. What Lewis brings to the game plan is an ability to provide long leads up to the wing, lengthening the forward half which then provides space I50 for Gunston and more importantly, the small forwards with run to take advantage of this space. This was best reflected in the Moore goal in the 3rd quarter where Lewis was able to kick over the wall into space for Moore to run on to. This is Lewis’ PoD compared to Chol and Dear, so the watch will be as to what strategy Mitchell and Hickmott want to pursue.

5. The evolution of the sub role – Since the start of the year, when Mitchell was looking to add experience to the team with Frost (2/2), Gunston (1/15) and Breust (2/5) selected as the subs, it has been Jiath (3/14), B. Macdonald (5/5), Maginness (3/13) and Mitchell (2/4) taking on this role. All are runners with Jiath, BMac and Mitchell having good leg speed, yet share the same weakness with decision making, however BMac has only played 7 games (with 2 starting games) compared Jiath (70) and Mitchell (28), so I suggest he has more opportunity to develop this skill set. The other common feature being that they are defensive options which then creates the need as to how to accommodate them if the sub is a tactical decision, given it is rare for a defender to be subbed off.

6. Impey has become the swing option – Taking into account the previous point, along with debate as to who is the best one to swing forward with Sicily or Hardwick seen as the obvious options, Impey has become the number 1 option with his recent performances. Given he spent the early part of his career at Port as a forward, it may well be that he is the one who is most comfortable going forward as Sicily has indicated his reluctance, plus Impey complements the defensive pressure that is a feature of the forward set up.

Observations:

• Unlike last week, this week the conditions dictated the style of play which meant our DE was 57% whilst Port went at 52%.

• In the 2nd quarter with the wind, when we were able to get some overlap run on the broadcast side, on a few occasions, we looked to try dry weather options with quick hands rather than taking the territory which we fumbled. Whereas in the 4th quarter, we more readily looked to kick the ball off the ground and maintain momentum going forward.

• Barrass was able to get into good marking positions early in the game, but dropped ones he should have taken. Having said that he took a couple in the last quarter when Port did venture forward.

• Moore’s stats for the season haven’t been much different than last year, however in this game, he was able to get into scoring positions or towards the end of the chain rather than at the start or middle of them. See his KE 28% doesn’t read well, but again the conditions required territory rather than beauty.

• Maginness as the tagger looks to be a “horses for courses” strategy as noted with JHF and Rozee out, being able to shut out Butters takes out their engine room. I think Mitchell doesn’t want to upset the midfield mix on handover etc.

• Battle taking ruck contests around the ground meant that Nash was able to remain in the midfield with his strength and power provided an advantage as they didn’t have a similar sized mid. Having said that Wines as their chop out option gave us a strong advantage.

• Dear in the centre bounces was competitive, but he is still a lean build.

• 0 disposals quarters – Barrass (1st); Dear (2nd).

• Tackle count by quarter – 21/14; 24/10; 25/19; 27/36

• I50 count by quarter – 9/13; 20/10; 15/13; 21/8 – winning the I50 count for 3 quarters is significant given the conditions.

• TOG % - Bottom 5 (leaving out subs): Worpel 68%, D’Ambrosio 69%, Nash 72%, Scrimshaw 73%, Ginnivan 74%. (Hardwick 96% highest.)

• Kicking efficiency (DE): B.Macdonald100% (100), Sicily 77% (86), Hardwick 73% (74), Barrass 67% (80), Impey 67% (62), Battle 64% (71)

Maginness 0% (44), Nash 22% (37), Morrison 25% (43), Moore 28% (41), Ginnivan 33% (48), D’Ambrosio 36% (53).

Starting 4: (CBA/CC)

1st Qrt: Newcombe (17/1) Nash (17/0) Ward (13/0)

2nd Qrt: Newcombe Ward Worpel (13/1)

3rd Qrt: Newcombe Nash Ward

4th Qrt: Newcombe Ward Worpel

Meek 19/3 Watson 5/1 Dear 4/0 Moore 4/2

Overall, it was a game that worked to the advantage of Nash and Worpel, however the cleanliness of Ward along with the cameos of Watson and Moore provided the spark and an important point of difference to the big, bodied inside midfielders.

Coach killer

Given he’d benefitted from an off-the-ball free kick, you do wonder what Sicily was doing having a go at Lukosius a couple of minutes later.

Issue for the week:

With a five-day break, it will be a management issue this week as to whether players are managed, given the expected return of Day, the unfortunate news on Maginness addresses one conundrum. The next obvious one is what is the situation with Chol as to his injury or management.

Expand full comment
Robert Cotgrove's avatar

Great write uo as always, though I think you're a bit harsh on Ken. First of all, Ginni's cele was understated and Ken's amused reaction seemed genuine to me. I thought both of them showed class and respect and it was great to see.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts