Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mick Cowan's avatar

What was learnt:

1. Walking the talk – With Sam having put out the home truths in the after match press conference last week, Dylan Moore doubled down the next day with the “bring the mouthguards” quote that provide media fodder and supporter interest as to how the team would respond this week. Leading by example, Moore certainly made an impression on the game with 4 goals, 20 disposals with 8 centre square attendances, but only 1 tackle. The move to the centre square did give some immediate leg speed around the contest, although as mentioned last week, at his height will it be a sustainable strategy, particularly when Day comes back into the rotation. At the ground, it was apparent that there was a commitment to make the tackles stick which also may reflect the immaturity of the North side now. The other aspect of this was that the midfielders (and others) had the ability to stand up in or break tackles this week.

2. We are not featherweights but are bantamweights or middleweights. For those who had concerns that we may not be much better than North citing that the game would be close either way, it was evident that we are ahead of the Roos on game style and at this time, playing ability. The issue really is to ascertain if we are, in boxing terms, fighting in the bantamweight division and not yet able to move to the middleweight category. We are definitely not in the heavyweight class as yet.

3. The youngsters are alright. Playing against a team that has players of a comparable age range and experience, it was evident that Macdonald, Mackenzie, Weddle & Mitchell were comparable to their opponents. When consideration is given as to where they were taken in their respective drafts, this game demonstrated that the concerns of the preceding week provided another example of “things not being as bad or as good as you think that they are”. When you look at the BH game, the Roos had Greenwood, Shiels and Stephenson playing significant roles as against Ward, O’Sullivan, Dear and Ryan – there is a future for those that are prepared to be patient.

4. Meek is a ‘meat & potatoes” ruck man. With four games under his belt, the closest that Lloyd can get to finesse is by using a dictionary looking up fitness. His capacity to take marks around the ground is not a strength now and similarly, trying to be creative (see below) should be limited to handballing to players running past in very restricted circumstances. I think forward of centre that there is greater benefit from him kicking the ball long into the forward 50 as demonstrated by his long goal (intent is not a discussion point) and more obviously, in the 3rd quarter, where Chol had a mismatch to take a mark and goal. Similarly, his second goal reflected the need not to think about the decision and just execute the kick. Emblematic of Meek’s (lack of) attention to detail was in the 3rd quarter where there was a scrimmage in our forward flank/pocket which he was amid. When the umpire called for the ball up, he ambled back to set up the wall, but didn’t check to see if Chol had come up for the ball up (which he hadn’t), leaving Worpel to tackle Xerri after the contest. My watch here is to see how often, as the “big man”, he is not the one in the ground ball pack looking to get his knees dirty rather than standing on the outer ring as an outlet player.

5. Morrison is the vanilla ice cream in our midfield – In the middle of winter, when you sit down to your hot apple pie/crumble or sticky date pudding for those with a sweeter tooth, there is a need to have the scoop of ice cream with it, just to top it off. If you ate them separately, you wouldn’t get the same level of satisfaction. The same goes for our midfield as Morrison does appear to provide a sense of security to our midfield structure. He is the classic role player in the mold of Acres & MacIntosh – the issue with role is that they are more recognized for their stuff ups than their quiet achievements. (For those who prefer custard or cream, you do end up with a mess on your plate unsure as to which part is providing satisfaction to your palate.)

6. Clean hands are THE key – This is going to be the weekly measure!

Observations:

• Chol is starting to understand his role as both the outlet option on the wing and kick outs as well as being a disruptor in the marking contest in the forward 50. It was the first game where we had multiple goals from crumbing the contest or being front & square. His casual approach to his first shot from outside 50 reflected the approach he displays at training. His second shot reflected a more professional approach with the right outcome. Interestingly, with his shot after the siren at ¾ time, he appeared to be more stilted in his approach.

• Gunston’s goal kicking accuracy is not what it was. Considering where he took his shots from, there is a case for a little leniency to be given, however again, the shots themselves didn’t look to be “close”. At training, anecdotally, it has been noticed that his accuracy in goal kicking drills isn’t as strong as it was and his approach to his kick appears to be stiff.

• Whilst Meek’s goal from the centre square gained plaudits, it is worth going back to the centre clearance where Nash was able to provide a clean left-handed handball with an opponent hanging off his back to Newcombe who handballed to Meek for his long bomb. The Nash handball was the sort of action that Cripps has been lauded for over the years.

• CMac & Mackenzie played their best halves as a pair for the year. CMac did burn a couple of opportunities – his own shot for goal in the 1st quarter and a poor decision when clear entering F50 in the 3rd quarter where he kicked to Chol who was covered by two defenders rather than running further to hit Gunston free on the open side or the short entry. Mackenzie did use his left foot once whilst not “Jarman like” it was adequate – the hope being he develops his non-dominant side of his disposal.

• The desperation and cover of Impey I’d suggest is a feature of his game that goes unnoticed by many as epitomised by his diving in the goal square for a rushed behind. He actually led the inside 50 count.

• The form of Sicily has drawn some attention, with the way North played, I doubt their ball movement was be read by their own forwards which makes it hard for a player such as Sicily who looks to act as an interceptor. Aligned with this, the commitment of Scrimshaw and Frost to the ariel contest this year, has also impacted on Sicily’s role.

• Again, the run from behind handball in the middle of the ground, Weddle runs himself into traffic and a running banana from 40m out is not a high percentage play, compared to the CMac/Amon from the flank with no pressure, but a tighter angle.

• Weddle watch – he was again thrown forward and had a brief run as the around ground ruck man.

Starting 4:

1st Qrt: Worpel (20) Nash (25) Newcombe (21)

2nd Qrt: Mackenzie (15) Nash Newcombe (Amon to a wing)

3rd Qrt: Worpel Nash Newcombe

4th Qrt: Worpel Nash Newcombe

(Meek 27 Moore 8 Chol 3 Hustwaite 1)

Coach Killer

A ruck man kicking the ball backwards into the defensive 50 to a 2 on 1 is not what you want in the first 5 minutes of the game (fortunately Zurhaar missed).

Contenders: Kick ins from Sicily (execution of the kick) and Amon (late change of decision) with both occurring when we had the run of the game last in 2nd quarter.

Play of the day

In the 3rd quarter, a contest ground ball contest on the back edge of the centre square broadcast wing, Nash made body contact, followed up by Worpel tackling, then Mackenzie pressuring the North player out of the ball, allowing CMac to handball to Maginness to hit Gunston with a 50m pass on the run; handballing to Moore to kick the goal from the goal line.

Issue of the week:

• What to do with Dimma?

With Papley on the table next week, the obvious response would be to put Dimma back, however will it give us the best means to win or save the game? Playing at the MCG, Dimma as a forward will have more room to work in as a hit-up option and as his pass to Finn demonstrated, his inside 50 delivery is as good as anyone. Other than their talls, the Swans tend to play a zone defence, so a smart forward may be able to find some holes. Further to this, given they play McDonald, McLean and Amartey, this means Frost, Scrimshaw and Sicily (or Serong) with a mix of Papley, Hayward, Fox (possible tag for Sicily) & Wicks with Heeney rolling forward. This leaves Impey, Mitchell & Amon/D’Ambrosio as the alternative defensive options.

This may be a test of the “no limits” mantra.

Expand full comment
Stuart McKenzie's avatar

We made a decision at the end of the 2021 season to go with Sam and at the end of 2022, we doubled down by committing to a hard core rebuild with a significant change in the list profile that required a commitment to developing youngsters. We knew that there would be pain and we felt that most acutely in the first 1/3 of last season and again last week against GCS. It's part of the strategy we've committed to and the catastrophising that took place last week from the football media and from Hawks fans was pretty ordinary. Similarly, as nice as it was to win against North, it was against a team that is one of the worst the competition has seen for quite some time and needs perspective.

The foundation of any successful team is consistency of pressure and this has been a concern this year. Notwithstanding the standard of opposition, our best quarter of footy this season coincided with our highest pressure rating for the season. If we can maintain high pressure on the opposition (and we understand that with a young team this will vary), we will at least be relatively hard to play against and that has to be the defining feature of our team.

It was great to see Newcombe and Nash win plenty of the ball and play with some real grunt, but is there any concern that Worps has gone off the boil this past fortnight? He was the standard bearer over the first four games and am hoping that he can return to something like his best this weekend. It was refreshing to see Dylan Moore in for a number of centre bounces - he is small but does provide a point of difference with his scurry from congestion and ability to draw a free kick. It would be good to see McDonald spend some time in there as well to further vary the mix.

The role of Finn is still an issue. We can't honestly be looking at him as a part of our forward line going forward? Which begs the question, what is his role in this team? He wasn't a hard tag on Sheezel, just as he wasn't on Flanders last week, both winning plenty of the ball, though we could argue the effectiveness versus volume. If Finn isn't playing a hard tag on an opposition midfielder, there's no place for him in the team. Mick's comment re Morrison has some merit (he's more the Black & Gold brand vanilla ice cream than the Blue Ribbon though), but he is still a plodder who consistently makes skill errors. Unfortunately, with CJ's injury, there is a wing role that remains available, and for now Harry probably has that. As with Finn though, Harry's not a part of our future.

Selection will be interesting this week. If Lewis and Day are available, it probably means that Serong and Hustwaite go out, with Massimo perhaps playing as the sub. Or perhaps Massimo has a rest this weekend. I think we play Seamus on Papley and have to back in Scirm, Frosty and Sic to do the job on McDonald, Amartey and McLean. If Heeney goes forward, Impey or Weddle will have to play on him. While he probably won't return to the senior side, terrific to see Josh Ward respond so well and very exciting to see young Calsher developing nicely. It will be a very special moment if he does get to make his senior debut.

If we can maintain the pressure this week and keep the diabolical errors to a minimum, we should hope to be competitive.

Mick, thanks again for your post and for injecting some excellent humour.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts