Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul OKeefe's avatar

When you think it can't get any better you look at the ladder and see Carlton third last

Expand full comment
Mick Cowan's avatar

What was learnt:

1. The under 80 gamers carried the day – For those who read “Rule 529 – Balancing performance with development” should have seen this game as a representation of what the coaches would be hoping to see this season i.e. the players with less than 80 games being able significantly impact the result. This group, in no specific order, includes Meek, Mackenzie, Ward, Watson, Weddle, & Maginness – all of whom had a significant influence on the result of this game. It would be inarguable to say that this group collectively played their best game for the season and for a couple of individuals arguably their best career game. This would represent performance aligning with the development of the playing group.

2. In windy conditions, centre clearances are key – In these conditions, it was a key to win the centre clearances to give your back six a chance to get some support from the midfield in establishing a defensive wall. The 1st quarter dominance of GWS to set up a defensive wall made it almost impossible for the back six to exit with any surety. It must be highlighted that the Giants didn’t score a goal in the last 12 minutes of this quarter, which in the end was a significant defensive effort. This point was particularly evident in the third quarter where we were able to establish clearance dominance – we should have had the first three clearances, but fumbled a couple of them allowing GWS to get the takeaway.

3. Structure is still important to any system – The other aspect to playing in these conditions is to maintain your structure forward of the ball. It was clear that the forward half “lost” their shape as they pushed up to help out the back six. Hence when we were able to gain control of the ball, we were caught out. The best forward movement was when Watson took a mark, ran forward allowing Gunston became an option on the flank. Just as the video doing the rounds last week on the defensive structure coming forward, the forwards had to stay in shape to allow for the overlap run going into the wind which was rectified in the third quarter.

4. Meek was massive – After a couple of games where he lowered his colours, Meek came back to his 2024 form. In fact, this game demonstrated a couple of improvements in his game, taking 4 marks with 2-3 in a pack situation and the one where he pushed forward for the first goal being equally important. The other improvement was his centre clearance work – on a couple of occasions, Meek ended up with the forward 50 entry kick and rather than just bang it on his boot, he did look to take his time and provide an entry that was at least 50/50 opportunity for the forwards.

5. Nash claimed his man, but again without the kudos – Once again, Nash did his job on Tom Green whilst had enough of the ball to have an offensive impact. Green had 31 disposals but on effectiveness was 4/9 kicks and 15/22 handballs for 281 metres gained. Nash was 9/11 and 3/6 for 406 metres gained. Notably, Nash wasn’t used as the chop out ruck option to ensure that we didn’t lose our midfield structure around the contest.

6. Hardwick as a forward showed its worth – For those who have wondered if the move of Hardwick forward was to the best use for the team, this game demonstrated his worth as a forward and if he had kicked straight, it would have been even more obvious. His forward craft is elite which may go back to his U/18 days or what he has learnt in his first 140+ games playing as a defender. His work off the ball protecting the area for other forwards is not always noted and in a small forward structure, the capacity to protect and create space is vital to its success. His ability to go back in quarter is as important as Sicily going forward.

Observations:

• It wasn’t really a night for tall forwards (Hogan was the exception with some good service and a free to goal), however the pressure applied by Chol in the front half can’t be ignored.

• The Finn clamp was back in action – as part of Mitchell’s desire for flexible players, Maginness’s ability to move on to Callaghan was significant. His metres gained by quarter were: 321/256/178/34 and it is worth noting that the 3rd quarter stat was inflated by Battle’s poor decision rather than Finn’s efforts.

• Allowing scores from kick ins will be a review point – Maginness missed his assignment for the one in the 3rd quarter.

• The two B’s finally have shown themselves to be “human” - Battle still has some decision-making education to work on & Barrass needs to trust his teammates to win contest whereas his Eagles’ memories may have meant he felt the need to be the man all the time.

• Ginnivan’s footy IQ was really important in passages of play where he used tap ons rather than possessions to keep the ball in motion moving forward.

• Watson from 50m out with the wind still isn’t the best option. Even Hardwick had issues from this distance under the conditions.

• 4 (or 5) goals from non-forwards – depends on how Weddle is classified.

Starting 4:

1st Qrt: Day (18) Newcombe (18) Nash (18)

2nd Qrt: Day Newcombe Nash

3rd Qrt: Day Newcombe Nash

4th Qrt: Day Newcombe Nash

Meek 21; Mackenzie 10; Ward 3; Chol 2; Moore 2

Again, recognising the importance of the centre square clearances, there was no experimentation in the starting 4 of each quarter.

Issue for the coming 15 days:

If Worpel’s return goes to plan, how will the team line-up for Gather Round?

Given Mackenzie was in the team when Worpel played in Round 1, the players who have come into the side since then are Ward, Jiath, Gunston and Breust. As a like for like choice, it would appear that Ward and then Jiath may be the ones to be unlucky, however on form it would be hard to drop either. With Breust barely playing as a sub in this game, it would be fair to say his place would be in question, which would allow Gunston to return to the sub role based on the evidence being that Mitchell likes an experienced head in the role. The other player whose form may bring him into the discussion on a role basis could be D’Ambrosio as both his impact and numbers are down on his 2024 form. This week, only his 3rd quarter reflected his 2024 form and he didn’t touch it in the 2nd quarter, then considering his games against the Blues (poor 1st half) and Dons, his contributions may be a watch on the basis of selection integrity.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts