Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mick Cowan's avatar

What was learnt:

1. A time management game means that you want to shop early was once said – No doubt there was a level of “frustration” with the way the game played out, but when you reflect on the TOG%, it is evident that this was a game structured considering the run home. With only Hardwick playing more than 90% (91%) whereas it is not unusual to have 6-8 players above 90%, usually defenders, it is apparent that Mitchell and Burge were looking at the overall management of the playing group. As acknowledged by Mitchell, Newcombe being subbed was an obvious example of this. Furthermore, with Day being on managed minutes, it provided another factor in this strategy. It is worth remembering that earlier in the year, many were concerned with the slow starts from the team, so jumping out of the gates in this situation worked to our longer term purposes. BTW For those who were concerned about the “emotion” spurring on Carlton, I’d suggest that the emotion has more impact in ensuring that the team isn’t soundly, so at least they can carry the player off with some respect rather than a 10+ goal loss.

2. Day’s return demonstrated he hadn’t lost his attack on the ball, but lacked some touch with his disposals – There was no question that Day hadn’t lost his competitive streak through his lengthy break, although having been engaged in match sim at training, it was evident that Day still needed to adjust the competitive nature of the game with his disposals as he missed some targets early and/or put his teammates into poor situations. Match sim doesn’t go at 100% nor do they tackle to “hurt”. A key skill of a great player is their capacity to make good players better with the way they set up their teammates when they give them the ball. Day is still yet to play 80 games, so this is still a watching brief on his development.

3. The left footers were lackadaisical, ambitious or irresponsible by foot – As three players who are “lauded” for their foot skills, Amon, Scrimshaw and D’Ambrosio would like to have a couple of their kicks back as they missed targets by some distance at various stages which then caught us out on the turnover. It is worth noting that such errors have been the ones Sicily has been criticised for in his recent run of alleged poor form. For Amon, this has become a trend in recent weeks, when he has been as safe as anyone, whereas one of Scrimshaw’s kicks brought back memories of the one he copped a serve at ¼ time break last year. As for D’Ambrosio, his more egregious fault was missing Lewis on a long lead from the goal square in the first quarter after Ginnivan had run interference on Weitering and Lewis was happy to give him a serve, given he kicked it to a contest that Weitering was able to kill. Like Mackenzie’s search for perfection rather than practical, when D’Ambrosio has the ball outside 50 for the entry from a mark/free, he too seeks out the perfect.

4. The 2nd ruck option around the ground does create issues for us – With the Blues having the luxury of playing Pittonet and TDK, it meant that we would always be under the pump when Meek went off the ball and even when Pittonet was subbed out with McKay taking up this role. In the 3rd quarter, we gave up another goal from a throw-in when Nash had to take the ruck role. Lewis was able to provide coverage in the forward 50, however when the opposition has a genuine 2nd alternative e.g. Thilthorpe, Darcy, McInerney/Fort, then we are at a disadvantage as it also messes with our midfield mix taking Nash out of the contest on the ground. On this broader issue, Meek was dominant in the tap work, however the mids, particularly in the centre square weren’t always clean with their first touch.

5. Hardwick going back has allowed Impey to move forward – With Hardwick moving back to his defensive role, it has released Impey on two aspects of his game. Firstly, Impey has been able to resume to his overlap running role from half back, having played to the lockdown role when Hardwick was playing as a forward. Secondly, with the sub being a defensive player, this has meant a defender going forward with either mid or forward being subbed off, with Impey becoming the preferred option in recent weeks.

Observations:

• After a slow couple of weeks, C. Macdonald’s first half looked to have him back closer to his 2024 form. As he acknowledged in his post-match chat with Ash, the ankle injury earlier in the year did disrupt his season. Finally seeing him in for some CBAs would have pleased a number of HIs.

• If B. Macdonald wants to make the sub role his own, then he needs to make sure that he doesn’t have regular brain fades such running too far. Whilst not a coach killer, it may open the door for others who aspire for the sub role as a way back into the team e.g. Jiath, Mackenzie.

• Dear’s goal kicking is still a work in progress as his misses can come from excellent opportunities e.g. last quarter this week. Lewis from limited chances looks to have a better technique at this time.

• Carlton looked to play the tall wingers as a strategy with Acres (193cm) and Docherty (187cm) starting there – D’Ambrosio 178cm/Morrison 184cm.

• Ward imposed himself on the contest, particularly in the first half, continuing to frank his form this year. It is notable that in the past couple of games he hasn’t had the “poor” kick which was part of his game earlier in the year.

• Barrass played his best game for the year, and his worth will certainly be seen in the coming weeks.

• Each quarter we jumped out of the blocks which worked to the advantage of players’ time management. Having said that, in the first and second quarters, we wasted some chances late in each.

• Nash played another strong game on Cripps not allowing him to impose himself on contests.

• Scrimshaw’s contested marking was a return to his strengths.

• 8.5 from 16 set shots could’ve been better when you think about a couple that were missed from good looks. (5.1 from 8 shots in general play – 3 from the goal square.)

• 0 disposals quarters – Morrison (3rd).

• Tackle count by quarter – 19/10; 17/17; 12/18; 19/15. Shopped early and late to seal the deal.

• I50 count by quarter – 11/11; 13/10; 10/15; 10/9.

• TOG % - Bottom 5 (leaving out subs): Day 69%, D’Ambrosio 72%, Lewis 76%; Nash 77%, C. Macdonald 78% (Hardwick 91% highest.)

• Kicking efficiency (DE): Newcombe 100% (100); Barrass 100% (100); B.Macdonald100% (100); Battle 100% (93); D’Ambrosio 92% (86); Hardwick 87% (90).

Meek 16% (46); C. Macdonald 43% (63); Scrimshaw 56% (73); Dear 57% (55); Watson 57% (69).

Starting 4: (CBA/CC)

1st Qrt: Newcombe (12/1) Day (16/1) Ward (10/1)

2nd Qrt: Newcombe Nash Worpel (14/0)

3rd Qrt: Newcombe Day Ward

4th Qrt: Day Ward Nash

Meek 23/3 C. Macdonald 3/1 Moore 3/0 Watson 3/0 Dear 2/0

(Morrison 0/1)

With the Big 4 back together, for the first time since Opening Round (and only for a half in that game), it is worth noting that Ward started in the CBA at the start of the game and again after half-time. As noted earlier, CMac going into the CBA was something that many HIs have been looking forward to for a couple of seasons.

Issue for the (coming) weeks:

No doubt the issue that will dominate discussion is the make up of the forward six as to which combination of talls will be part of it, injuries aside. This means what will be the “criteria” applied to work out the best mix with the following having to be taken into consideration (in no order):

• Contested marking IF50

• Contested marking outside F50

• Ability to crash packs

• Leading forward work as a marking target and/or to create space

• Field kicking

• Goal kicking accuracy.

• 2nd ruck option

• Ruck option if Meek was to be injured in game

• Ability to apply forward pressure.

Expand full comment
Stephen's avatar

I thought it was one of those games where, had we been in Collingwood's current position, we could afford to coast after quarter time which we did. Unfortunately, we have the hardest run home of any team fighting for a spot in the 8. Therefore, percentage was important, and we wasted that opportunity. Subsequent results proved that to be the case. I still think a win over Melbourne + one of the other 3 should be enough to play finals. But getting that second win is going to be really tough. If you were betting on it, Hawthorn would be starting as a relative outsider in all 3 games. There's a big risk we could miss out.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts